Soc 120 - Michael Vick: Any Integrity?

Published: 2021-06-29 06:28:47
essay essay

Category: Book Reports

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

GET MY ESSAY
Michael Vick: Any integrity?

Dustin Bateman

SOC 120

Professor Kay Green

9/8/2010




















According to the textbook; Thinking Critically about Ethical Issues, by Vincent Ryan Ruggiero ethics is the study of right and wrong conduct and is based on consequences. Integrity is adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty. (Ruggiero, 2007). So in turn, ethical integrity is holding yourself to a higher standard of honesty, loyalty, and empathy. The best way to live your life is by always treating everyone as you would want them to treat you. Now, with all of this being stated, why is it that some superstars and celebrities feel as if they do not have to obey the law? It may be that they are blinded by their gifts and talents. Or it may be that they see themselves above the societal and government laws and regulations. In this paper, I will elaborate and argue both sides of Michael Vick's situation both scornfully and as an interceder.
First of all, I would like to break down the definition of ethical integrity. Ethics is an external system of rules and laws (Brooks and Czimbal, 2010). There are usually rewards to reap when the rules are followed and consequences to face when they are broken. Integrity is an internal system of principles which guides our behavior and the rewards are intrinsic (Brooks and Czimbal, 2010). Skills for Success (Brooks and Czimbal, 2010) states that integrity is a choice rather than an obligation. It also reads that even though influenced by upbringing and exposure, integrity cannot be forced by outside sources. When we are acting with integrity we do what is right - even if no one is watching. Ethical integrity is basically not betraying convictions or moral standards regardless of the consequence it may bring. Steroids have become a major problem for the National Football League (N.F.L.) recently. As a former football player and steroid abuser, I understand, to a certain degree, why athletes would inject human growth hormones. They will help any player that is trying to gain weight and increase strength in a short amount of time. Steroids can also assist someone in losing weight as well. The truth is that they are banned in the National Football League (N.F.L.). Actually, they are not just banned in professional sports all together; they are illegal in the United States of America (U.S.A.). When a player decides to abuse steroids, they are compromising his ethical integrity. He risks losing his job and even incarceration. While they are commonly abused by athletes and bodybuilders as a means to improve their performance and gain muscle mass quickly, do not be misled. Steroids are illegal and banned because they have harmful and potentially fatal effects on the body, and they have been a controlled substance in the United States since 1991(Zaremba, 2010). This is a topic that we would think someone should know better considering the consequences. But in fact, many athletes jeopardize their ethical integrity each time they decide to use a steroid.
A search warrant executed on April 25, 2007 as part of a drug investigation of Vick's cousin Davon Boddie let to discovery of evidence of unlawful dog fighting activities at a property owned by Vick in rural Surry County in southeastern Virginia, with extensive dog fighting facilities (Judd, 2007). There is a great debate and concern when it comes to sports players being held accountable for their ignorance, being oblivious to what is right or wrong because of their cultural background; race and socioeconomic status, and being a regular flesh toting man, not role model; because they didn't ask for that role they just want to play the game (Bradshaw, 2010). Vick paid a hefty price for a crime he said he never even knew was a crime. He later went on to say that it was a momentary lack of judgment, which completely contradicts the fact that he did not think it was a crime. On December 10, Vick appeared in U.S. District Court in Richmond for sentencing, Judge Hudson announced Vick as a "full partner" in the dog fighting ring, and was sentenced to serve 23 months in federal prison. He sacrificed his ethical integrity the moment he began holding dog fights and wagering bets.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!

GET UNIQUE ESSAY

We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read